<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comments from the peanut gallery&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://analytical-mind.com/2009/11/25/comments-from-the-peanut-gallery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://analytical-mind.com/2009/11/25/comments-from-the-peanut-gallery/</link>
	<description>Offering new paradigms to improve performance and quality of life at work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:58:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: comments from the peanut gallery</title>
		<link>http://analytical-mind.com/2009/11/25/comments-from-the-peanut-gallery/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[comments from the peanut gallery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 05:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://analytical-mind.com/?p=751#comment-560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] from the peanut gallery     Comments from the peanut gallery... &#124; Analytical-MindComments from the peanut gallery. Now that&#039;s established, I want to make a distinction between [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from the peanut gallery     Comments from the peanut gallery&#8230; | Analytical-MindComments from the peanut gallery. Now that&#039;s established, I want to make a distinction between [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Proulx</title>
		<link>http://analytical-mind.com/2009/11/25/comments-from-the-peanut-gallery/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Proulx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://analytical-mind.com/?p=751#comment-559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely. People should not use openness to cover-up for &lt;a href=&quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/wishy-washy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wishy-washiness&lt;/a&gt;.

As they say in Scrum &quot;Inspect and Adapt&quot;. Make a decision, learn from your mistakes, and build on the process. Going back and forth doesn&#039;t move you forward.

Thanks for your comment Alfonso.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. People should not use openness to cover-up for <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/wishy-washy" rel="nofollow">wishy-washiness</a>.</p>
<p>As they say in Scrum &#8220;Inspect and Adapt&#8221;. Make a decision, learn from your mistakes, and build on the process. Going back and forth doesn&#8217;t move you forward.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment Alfonso.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfonso</title>
		<link>http://analytical-mind.com/2009/11/25/comments-from-the-peanut-gallery/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alfonso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://analytical-mind.com/?p=751#comment-558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.

Other key additional point is that once a decision is taken (regardless approach use to get to it), to move on.

Many times, to visit / re-visit decisions is taken by some as a sign of openness ...

This approach is, many times, at least, a waste of both time and focus.

Decisions can / should only be revisited if and only if significant changes took place, and render the decision / objective not longer valid]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>Other key additional point is that once a decision is taken (regardless approach use to get to it), to move on.</p>
<p>Many times, to visit / re-visit decisions is taken by some as a sign of openness &#8230;</p>
<p>This approach is, many times, at least, a waste of both time and focus.</p>
<p>Decisions can / should only be revisited if and only if significant changes took place, and render the decision / objective not longer valid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

