Analytical-Mind
A blog offering new paradigms to improve performance and quality of life at work.
  • Home
  • About Me
  • My Virtual Bookshelf
  • Contact Me

Less projects were reported to be successful in 2008

Posted on: 05-11-2009 Posted in: Leadership

The Standish Group released the most recent version of the Chaos Summary Report 2009 on April 23rd and the results are worst than last year with only 32% of all projects surveyed were reported to be successful (down from 35% in 2006).In the context of this survey, a project is defined to be successful if it was delivered on time, on budget and with the required features.

Chaos Summary Report 2009

Chaos Summary Report 2009

Along the same lines, 44% of the projects were challenged (did not meat one or many of the success criteria) while 24% totally failed. The Standish Group highlights that costs overrun 54% (+7%) and time overrun 79% (+7%) both went up compared to the 2006 results.

The reports also explains that the probability of success greatly decreases as the size of the project increases where projects costing less than $750,000 have 61% success rate while projects costing over $10 million only have 2% success rate.

The second part of the report present the 10 Laws of Chaos and while the report doesn’t make any correlation between these laws and the Agile principles, it is easy to make some correlations.

  1. Law of the Two Faces: Successful projects include business-knowledgeable users with good communication skills.
  2. Cheetah’s Law: Swift decisions are typically better than long, drawn-out analysis.
  3. Law of the Roads: Clarity and focus are essential to a successful project.
  4. Law of the Five Deadly Sins: It is how you deal with each of these sins that will determine the success or failure of your project.
  5. Law of the Long-Tailed Monster: Over- and under-building applications represents the biggest form of software development waste.
  6. Law of the Edible Elephant: Software should be built in small, iterative steps with small, focused teams.
  7. Law of the Mad Hatter: Complexity causes confusion and cost.
  8. Law of the Empty Chair: Keep the project cycles short with continuous deliverable.
  9. Panda’s Law: Inaction is the purest form of failure.
  10. Law of the Fools: It is not just having the right tools but the skill to use them that make all the difference.

Can you draw the parallels with the Agile principles?

About the Author

Martin Proulx
I am an agile organizational coach and president of Pyxis Technologies.   Most people agree that I am an effective coach, an influential leader and a change agent oriented towards achieving extra-ordinary results. For nearly 20 years, I have put in place and managed software development organizations. Throughout the years, I have developed an expertise in organizational development, business process reengineering, people and project management.

  • Popular Posts
  • Related Posts
  • Agile self-organized teams - is the team self-organized or not?
    Agile self-organized teams - is the team self-organized or not?
  • Agile transitions are hard. I wonder why people feel the need to control?
    Agile transitions are hard. I wonder why people feel the need to control?
  • Which stance should I take? The 4 quadrants of Agile Managers
    Which stance should I take? The 4 quadrants of Agile Managers
  • My Virtual Bookshelf
    My Virtual Bookshelf
  • Analytical-Mind has moved
    Analytical-Mind has moved
  • Adapting your leadership style to the maturity level of your self-organizing team
    Adapting your leadership style to the maturity level of your self-organizing team
  • Agile managers do not act like cowboys
    Agile managers do not act like cowboys
  • 12 tips to be a better coach
    12 tips to be a better coach
  • (2) Comments
  • (0) Trackbacks
  1. Danielle11-06-09

    Great Stats!! any idea where I can get more info from te CHAOS report without having to pay thousands of dollars?

    (reply)
    • Martin Proulx11-09-09

      Unfortunately, I don’t have more information than when appears in the summary report.

      (reply)

Popular Posts

  • Agile self-organized teams - is the team self-organized or not?
    01-25-2011
  • Agile transitions are hard. I wonder why people feel the need to control?
    10-5-2010
  • Which stance should I take? The 4 quadrants of Agile Managers
    12-20-2010
  • My Virtual Bookshelf
    01-24-2011
  • What is the job of the president in a self-organized company?
    10-18-2010

Blogroll

  • Agile Gardener – Gardening Agile Knowledge
  • Great Leadership – Opinions and information on leadership and leadership development by Dan McCarthy
  • John Baldoni On: Leadership, Leadership development, Managing people
  • Management 3.0 – Leading Agile Developers, Developing Agile Leaders
  • Management, Development, Complexity, and Me
  • Marshall Goldsmith On: Leadership, Managing people, Coaching
  • Pyxis Technologies
  • Umuntu – It's all about people and humans, anyone at all …
Avatars by Sterling Adventures
Recent Posts
  • Analytical-Mind has moved
    08-10-2011
  • Adapting your leadership style to the maturity level of your self-organizing team
    08-9-2011
  • Agile managers do not act like cowboys
    08-1-2011
  • 12 tips to be a better coach
    06-20-2011
  • Gartner's Enterprise-Class Agile Development Defined
    06-6-2011
Recent Comments
  • links for 2011-08-14 « Dan Creswell’s Linkblog on Adapting your leadership style to the maturity level of your self-organizing team
  • Michael cardus on Analytical-Mind has moved
  • Making The Entire Organization Agile | Pyxis blog on The myths of self-organized teams
  • Making The Entire Organization Agile | Pyxis blog on Yet Another Agile Maturity Model (AMM) – The 5 Levels of Maturity
  • Adapting your leadership style to the maturity level of your self-organizing team | Analytical-Mind on Seven wrong reasons to adopt Agile
About Me

Meta
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
© 2008-2011 Martin Proulx
StumbleUponRedditDiggdel.icio.usLinkedIn